A Bus Transfer System (BTS) is designed to provide process continuity to the loads attached to a motor bus while transferring the bus from one source to another. Such systems find immense use and importance in several critical situations in continuous process industries (petrochemical plants, chemical plants, semiconductor manufacturing plants, paper mills, textile mills, etc.) and fossil-fuel-fired as well as combined cycle gas turbine plants & nuclear power generation stations. The BTS directly contributes to saving revenue loss, avoiding large capital losses associated with material wastage on a break in process continuity, and avoiding large operation and maintenance costs and delays associated with process restarts. A BTS also safeguards against potential safety hazards that relate to sudden process interruptions.
Bus transfer is best appreciated by virtue of its automatic operation on the contingency of the old source currently servicing the plant motor load, such that the old source gets disconnected from the motor bus, and the healthy alternate available source gets connected to the motor bus. Such an action that avoids the loss of process continuity is extremely desirable, provided it does not compromise the safety features of the entire system.Bus transfer has been employed in various power generation and process industry scenarios using different philosophies and methods. Considerable research and survey work has been done in the field in the past. Traditionally, bus transfer has been included in the switchgear package of a typical medium voltage installation for power generation utilities and continuous process industries. However, its sphere of influence transcends the electrical systems of the plant, because the efficacy of a BTS directly affects the operations, revenue and short-term as well as long-term performance parameters of the plant.A bus transfer operation reflects on three vital parameters of the plant from the operation and maintenance (O&M) point of view: the duration of open-circuit condition of the motor bus, the electrical and mechanical stress endured by the motors and associated equipment during the bus transfer, and the blocking of the BTS during a short circuit condition at the motor bus. While the first parameter decides the speed with which power feed is restored for plant operations, the second and third parameters affect the safety and reliability aspects of the plant. These considerations merit an in-depth understanding and judicious implementation of such systems.
The fundamental concept of the BTS can be understood using the illustration shown in Fig. 1. Consider a configuration with a normal source connected to a motor bus and an alternate source. The motor bus has a single induction motor connected to it. The impedance of the sources can be considered to be quite small, compared to the motor impedance. (The source impedance could be significant in comparison to the motor impedance if there are two or three step-down transformers between thesource and the motor bus). Then, the motor bus transfer can be sequenced in the following two ways.
A. Parallel Transfer
Momentary paralleling is sequenced by first closing the alternate source breaker followed by the opening of the normal source breaker. In this case, both the sources are connected to the motor bus for some duration. Hence, this situation is referred to as momentary paralleling or hot transfer. A fault occurring in the momentary paralleling situation results in a very serious situation. For example, a fault in the normal source or its transformer will typically be designed to trigger the transfer of the motor bus to the alternate source. However, once paralleled, the alternate source will also feed into the fault. Under most bus system designs, the interrupt ratings for the normal and alternate source circuit breakers and the short-term withstand ratings of the normal and alternate source power transformers will be violated. Similarly, a motor winding fault occurring at the time of transfer will be fed by both the sources. Thus, the alternate source might be exposed to a short circuit during momentary paralleling. (Parallel transfer must be blocked when a short circuit occurs either at the motor bus or at the sources).
If there is a phase difference between the alternate source and the normal source at the time of the closing of the alternate source breaker, the paralleling will result in a power surge through the bus system which could damage the bus system components. Thus, it is necessary to monitor the phase difference between the motor bus and the alternate source before closing the alternate source breaker. A comparative analysis highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of parallel transfer is given in Table I.
B. Open Circuit Transfer
Open circuit transfer is sequenced by first opening the normal source breaker followed by the closing of the alternate source breaker. In this case, the motor bus is connected to neither source for some duration, thus referred to as an open circuit condition.
1) Spin Down Characteristics
In an open circuit condition, the deceleration coupled withdecaying trapped air-gap flux in the motor produces a decaying voltage on the motor bus, whose frequency is also continuously dropping. As shown in Fig. 2, before the motor bus is disconnected from the normal source, the motor bus voltage VBUS is identical to the normal source voltage VNORMAL. On the disconnection of the normal source, the motor bus voltage instantaneously becomes the residual voltage of the aggregate motor bus. For a single induction motor case, this is same as the residual voltage of the motor VRESIDUAL. Due to the load torque angle, VRESIDUAL lags VNORMAL prior to disconnection. In the open circuit condition, VRESIDUAL rotates in a spiral fashion, with decreasing magnitude and decaying phase as shown in Fig. 2.The spin down characteristics depends on the following factors:
a) Normal source integrity: If the normal source is healthy prior to the opening of the normal source breaker, the motor exhibits standard spin-down characteristics. However, in the event of a normal source fault prior to the transfer, (for instance, a 3-phase normal source transformer fault), the motor fields get de-energized, which affects the subsequent spin down characteristics.
b) Stored energy and motor load inertia: In an open circuit condition, the energy stored in the motor fields continuously decays as it is utilized for spinning the motor shaft. The total rotating inertia acts as a prime mover and delivers energy to the motor bus load and results in a deceleration of the rotating mass. Thus, a high moment of inertia shaft will take longer to spin down than a shaft with lower moment of inertia. Typical high-inertia loads include fans (conventional thermal plants), reactor coolant pumps (nuclear plants), etc. Low-Inertia loads include compressors, centrifugal pumps (nuclear and combined cycle plants), high-inertia fans attached to high voltagebuses (thermal plants), etc.
The spin-down characteristics of the motor bus determine the nature of open circuit bus transfer method feasible for the given system. The analysis of these characteristics is therefore an important component of a successful implementation of a BTS.
a) Simulation and modeling: The spin-down characteristics for a given system can be evaluated using modeling and simulation tools. The combined effect of a motor bus consisting of different motors can be studied in this manner. Itis important that the motor model matches the actual response of the motor under a dynamic decaying flux, subnormal frequency condition. However, such modeling may become impractical, due to the lack of relevant motor data available from the plant and/or motor manufacturers.
b) Event Recording: A practical, hands-on approach to the characterization of the spin-down is the observation and analysis of an actual spin-down of the motor bus under typical loading conditions. While this gives the required data unambiguously, it is very difficult to obtain such data specifically for bus transfer studies, since the tripping of the motor bus is essentially a plant trip, which is obviously undesirable in any continuously operating plant. Thus, specific arrangements have to be made to record such data during planned/unplanned shutdowns or during the maintenance period.
The re-energization of an open circuit motor bus, by means of closing the alternate source circuit breaker, is perhaps the most critical task for an open circuit bus transfer. Several factors need to be considered to avoid potentially damaging transient effects, such as abnormally high inrush currents and shaft torques. The factors that relate to these damaging transient effects are;
a) The motor bus residual voltage magnitude.
b) The phase angle between the motor bus residual voltage and the alternate source voltage.
c) The phase relationship between the oscillating shaft torque and transient electrical air gap torque, all at thetime of re-energization.
Consider the worst-case situation, where the alternate source voltage VALTERNATE is in phase opposition with VBUS and that VBUS voltage magnitude has not reduced significantly after the motor bus was disconnected from the normal source. The effect of closing the alternate source breaker at this point will be like applying twice the nominal rated voltage to the motor. Upon reconnection, the starting inrush current could be 2 times the normal starting current of the motor, which is about 6 to 10 times the rated full-load current under the transient conditions and 9 to 15 times the rated full load current under the subtransient conditions. Since the force towhich the motor is subjected is proportional to the square of the current, the situation can be extremely damaging. Such forces could loosen the stator coils, loosen the rotor bars of the induction motors, twist a shaft, or even rip the machine from its base plate. The cumulative abnormal magnetic stresses and/or mechanical shock, in the motor windings and to the shaft and couplings, could ultimately lead to premature motor failure due to fatigue. Analysis of re-energization effects require detailed shaft-motor driven load analysis using Electro-Magnetic Transients Program (EMTP) as prescribed by the NEMA MG-1 1987 standard.These problems motivate the use of appropriate, safe and reliable bus transfer techniques. A general requirement may therefore be defined as follows.
Irrespective of transfer configurations, a BTS typically has the following feature requirements:
The choice of the transfer method plays a critical role in the amount of stress the electrical system may be subjected to during the transfer. The methods differ in the processing, sequencing, and timing related to the closing of the alternate source breaker and the opening of the normal source breaker.The nature of the system dynamic conditions and the nature of the motor loads connected to the motor bus determine the choice of an optimal bus transfer method. The fast transfer method, in-phase transfer method, and the residual voltage transfer method are all open-circuit transfers.
A. Parallel Transfer Method
In this bus transfer method, the alternate source breaker is closed, followed by the opening of the normal source breaker.Thus, during the period of transfer, both the sources are effectively paralleled. Parallel transfer is generally used for start-up and planned shutdowns. It is recommended that the closing of the new source breaker be preceded by a sync-check, which ascertains whether the phase difference between the motor bus and the alternate source voltages is within limits. By blocking a transfer when the phase difference exceeds predefined limits, potentially damaging situations can be avoided.This method is not recommended for all transfer situations, because it may violate the interrupting ratings for the normal and alternate source circuit breakers and the short-term withstand ratings of the normal and alternate source power transformers. However, its popularity stems from its ease of application and operator understanding and the delivery of continuous power to the motor bus.
|i) Continuous power to motor bus during transfer permits orderly shutdown of units by eliminating bumps, avoiding motor contactor dropouts and motor overstress.||i) During parallel operation, the increase in available fault current to the motor bus caused by the stronger parallel sources requires either equipment with much higher fault duty ratings or minimized parallel time.|
|ii) Ease ofapplication and operator understanding.||ii) Will not work when steady state differences of voltage magnitude and/or phase are too large to allow safe transfer|
|iii) Cannot be used to transfer when the source to the motor bus is lost due to an electrical fault or abnormal condition.|
B. Fast Transfer Method
The fast transfer method aims to minimize the open circuit duration of the motor bus, after the normal source breaker is opened. This minimizes the decay in the motor bus voltage and phase, before the alternate source breaker is closed. There are two different kinds of fast transfer methods:
1) Simultaneous Fast Transfer: In this method, the control signals for opening the normal source breaker and closing the alternate source breaker are given simultaneously. Typically a breaker closing time is longer than the opening time. Thus, the motor bus is in an open circuit condition during the transfer. For typical breaker timings, the motor bus dead time might be as low as one or two cycles.
2) Sequential Fast Transfer: In this method, the control signals for closing the alternate source breaker is given only after the opening of the normal source breaker is ascertained. In some cases, an early contact which indicates that a breaker is in the process of opening is utilized. Depending on the breaker opening/closing times, motor bus dead times of 5 to 10 cycles can usually be obtained.A fast transfer is usually supervised by a sync-check between the alternate source and the motor bus. The sync check is achieved by comparing the phase difference between the alternate source voltage VALTERNATE and the motor busvoltage VBUS to a predefined limit, typically between 20 and 35 degrees. Using further processing, it is also possible to estimate the phase difference at the time of alternate source breaker closure in the sequential fast transfer method. This phase difference can be used for a more accurate sync-check in situations with faster dynamics. In several implementations,the ANSI C50.41 – 2000 criteria that specifies a maximum of 1.33 p.u. V/Hz across the alternate source breaker before closing is also used to supervise the fast transfer.
The fast transfer method has the following advantages.
a) The speed of transfer minimizes the interruption of power source to the motor bus.
b) It is a safe, and reliable, as well as economic, method to maintain operation of the motors.
c) Paralleling of the normal and alternate sources is avoided.
C. In-Phase Transfer Method
This method comes into use in those cases in which the fast-transfer criteria fails, thus blocking the closing of the alternate source breaker. This leads to a longer open circuit duration. The spin-down characteristics of the motor bus are important in determining the choice of this motor bus transfer method. The failure of a fast transfer can happen due to a variety of reasons, such as:
a) Alternate source and normal source are not synchronized or lost synchronization due to system conditions, such as the loss of a tie or a transmission line trip.
b) On disconnection of the normal source, the motor bus voltage phasor differs from the alternate source by a significant angle. This situation might arise even if the normal and alternate sources are synchronized and depend on the motor bus residual voltage characteristics in an open circuit condition.
As described earlier, the motor bus voltage phasor spirals clockwise with respect to the healthy source voltage phasor, as it spins down in the open circuit condition. Thus, in the event that the fast transfer is not possible, the alternate source breaker closing signal can be timed such that it closes whenthe phase difference between the motor bus voltage phasor and the alternate source voltage phasor is very small. This will reduce the motor stresses on reconnection since the alternate source is being applied to the motor bus in-phase, and, incertain situations, such a transfer can be smoother than a fast transfer as well.
For instance, consider the situation in Fig. 3. At time t = T0. the motor bus voltage phasor has a phase difference of φ(t=T0)with respect to the alternate source breaker. Moreover, assume that the first derivative φ’(t=T0) and second derivative φ’’(t=T0) of this phase difference are also available. Assuming that the closing command for the alternate source breaker is given at t= T0, the limited form of the Taylor’s expansion can be used to estimate the phase difference between the motor bus voltage phasor and the alternate source voltage phasor at the time of alternate source breaker closure.
If the phase difference between the motor bus voltage phasor and the alternate source voltage phasor at (t= T0+Tclosing) is estimated to be within predefined limits, then the inphase transfer method gives the closing command to the alternate source breaker.
Load shedding of the motor bus may be required for inphase transfer, depending on the characteristics of the motors connected to the motor bus. A detailed analysis of the behavior of the motor bus in the open circuit condition is required to ascertain the use of such load shedding. However,the main advantage of the in-phase transfer method is the ability to safely transfer the motor bus to the alternate source even if the fast transfer is blocked, without necessarily having to shed load. In many situations, this may also justify the addition of suitable loads such as synchronous generators, high-inertia flywheels, and voltage supporting capacitor banks to assure smooth in-phase motor bus transfers.
D. Residual Voltage Transfer Method
The residual voltage transfer method is the slowest transfer of the motor bus to the alternate source. The motor bus is allowed to remain in the open circuit condition, until the motor bus voltage magnitude decays to acceptable levels, usually 20 – 25% of its rated voltage. The alternate source breaker is then connected to the motor bus, regardless of the phase difference between the alternate source voltage phasor and the motor bus voltage phasor. Thus, the worst case voltage that could be applied to the motors would have an acceptable upper limit. Planned load shedding is quite commonly used before residual voltage transfer. For instance, the large motor loads that slowed down significantly during the open circuit condition will draw large currents upon the transfer of the motor bus tothe alternate source. Such a situation can trigger an over-current trip of the alternate source breaker.
The need of a bus transfer can be motivated by a variety of reasons.Thus, the means of initiating a bus transfer can be further classified as manual, protective, or auto transfer.
A complete and integrated BTS solution also needs to meet certain key requirements.
A. Monitoring BTS Readiness Conditions - Since the BTS performs system critical activities, it is typically recommended to continuously monitor the status of certain system conditions as a precondition to ascertaining its readiness to conduct bus transfer.
These usually include:
B. Breaker Failure Detection and Corrective Action
A breaker may fail to operate due to electrical and/or mechanical reasons during a bus transfer. This may result in dead bus/permanent paralleling, depending upon the failure of closing of new source breaker or opening of old source breaker respectively. Such a situation may be detected from the monitoring of the breaker NO/NC status inputs (52a, 52b) and/or the current flowing in the old source breaker and the new source breaker.
In the event of a permanent paralleling condition, the recently closed new source breaker is tripped. If this breaker fails to open as well, further upstream breakers may be sent tripping commands. This consideration needs to be taken into account before deciding on the type of switchgear for backup measures. In this situation, the station tie is preferred to be a breaker rather than an isolator, along with incorporation of corresponding control logic to trip the station tie breaker if both the UAT incoming and TIE breaker do not open on their respective tripping commands.
In the event of a dead bus condition (failure to close of new source breaker), the bus exhibits spin- down characteristics as discussed earlier. Correspondingly, depending on the detection time for the dead bus condition, it may be possible to re-close the old source breaker (provided it is healthy) in the fast/in-phase/residual voltage mode. The in-phase mode is most likely in this situation, since the phase drift would normally be expected to be significant before new source breaker closure failure is detected. A successful closing of the old source breaker using the in-phase method can keep the bus energized. This can help increase the operator confidence for opting for safer open circuit condition-based fast transfers even for manual/planned bus transfers, wherein parallel transfers were used earlier.
The online testing of the BTS enables the operator to periodically ascertain if all the functions of the BTS are operating healthily. It is also possible to operate, monitor, and consequently report the operation of the respective breaker tripping and closing contacts, after the insertion of a high resistance in series to these contacts during this test mode. This fictitious bus transfer gives the operator the highest degree of confidence, before actuating a planned manual bus transfer under the existing system conditions.
The use of a high-speed bus transfer system is very effective and beneficial to mitigate the problems related to the loss of process continuity in power plants and continuous process plants. The availability of an alternative source of supply can be best utilized if a high-speed bus transfer system is used to transfer the motor bus from the normal source of supply to the alternative source, in the event of a contingency of the normal source. This can provide enormous savings in revenue, plant load factor and O&M expenditure in the short term, while reducing motor maintenance in the long term. Customized application engineered system solutions incorporating such high-speed bus transfer technology are proven for providing significant benefits in both utility power plants as well as continuous process industries.
For more details, please visit our Downloads section to access related technical papers, presentations and case studies.